首页> 外文OA文献 >Experimental testing of joints for seismic design of lightweight structures: part 2: bolted joints in straps
【2h】

Experimental testing of joints for seismic design of lightweight structures: part 2: bolted joints in straps

机译:轻质结构抗震设计接头的实验测试:第2部分:带子中的螺栓连接

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

An experimental testing campaign on tensile bolted joints between straps is reported. Two dominant failure modes are identified: (1) tilting, bearing and tearing of the sheets (TS) and (2) tilting, bearing and net-section failure (NSF). The analysis in terms of ductility and strength shows that bolted connections are less adequate than screwed connections (reported in Part 1 of this paper) for the seismic design of X-braced shear walls in lightweight structures. NSF joints are more ductile than TS joints in the sense that they undergo larger displacements before failure. However, if washers are not used, both types of connections fail before energy dissipation through yielding of the diagonal straps can occur. Some design recommendations to improve the seismic performance of bolted joints, including the use of washers, are given. The accuracy of Eurocode 3 formulas to predict the ultimate load is also analyzed.
机译:据报道,对皮带之间的拉伸螺栓连接进行了实验测试。确定了两种主要的失效模式:(1)纸张倾斜,承重和撕裂(TS),以及(2)倾斜,承重和净截面失效(NSF)。就延性和强度进行的分析表明,对于轻型结构中的X形剪力墙的抗震设计,螺栓连接不如螺栓连接(本文第1部分报道)足够。 NSF接头比TS接头更具延展性,因为它们在失效前会经历较大的位移。但是,如果不使用垫圈,则这两种类型的连接都会失败,然后才可能因对角带的屈服而导致能量耗散。提出了一些改善螺栓连接的抗震性能的设计建议,包括使用垫圈。还分析了Eurocode 3公式预测最终载荷的准确性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号